Liaison Grant Funding Evaluation Rubric
Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations (3 points) |
Meets Fully (2 points) |
Adequate (1 point) |
Incomplete (0 points) |
Score |
Activities/ projects proposed for the upcoming year(s) with accompanying time frame
|
Grant application shows how the grant will enable ACRL liaison to develop a new relationship with the target group or continue relevant work; plan is specific, clearly outlined and objectives are defined; goals and objectives of activities are innovative, realistic and/or clearly stated; timeline is clear and identifies specific activities and dates for completion. |
Grant application reflects how the liaison will develop a new relationship with the target group or continue relevant work and on the importance of participation; plan is outlined and has some connection to the objectives; goals of activities are stated, realistic, and clear; timeline is included, lists activities and dates for completion. |
Grant application lists how the liaison will develop a new relationship with the target group or continue relevant work and lists the program or activities and general importance of participation; plan is outlined and goals of activities are stated; timeline is included. |
Incomplete or not addressed |
|
Funding Request/ Budget |
Proposed budget is realistic considering stated activities, and includes a narrative with justification and estimates, if available. |
Proposed budget is realistic considering the stated activities. |
Budget is documented and included in proposal. |
Incomplete or not addressed |
|
Relationship to ACRL Strategic Goals
|
Application demonstrates that participation aids in exposing the value of academic libraries, transforming student learning or transitioning to the new research and scholarly environment; activities match more than one of the strategic goals and objectives. |
Activities are clearly linked to strategic goals. |
Activities are linked to a strategic goal. |
Incomplete or not addressed |
|
Outcomes |
The proposed activities result in engaging or creative and successful outcomes; they have the potential to involve a great number of individuals; activities have long term potential and sustainability for future years |
Activities are successful in content or delivery; benefits from the activities are addressed and the activities may be duplicated in future years |
Addresses limited audience/activity with no projection on long term potential |
Incomplete or not addressed |
|
Assessment Plan |
Assessments, evaluations and reporting tools are defined, and relevant to the goals. |
Assessments and evaluations are listed and show some connection to goals. |
Assessments and evaluations for are listed. |
Incomplete or not addressed |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
*If a proposal is scored “0” in any category or earns a total score of “0-5” the applicant
will receive feedback from the Chair or Vice-Chair.