White Papers and Reports
ACRL Microsite Nav
-
About ACRL
- Give to ACRL
- Annual Reports
- Bylaws
-
Directory of Leadership
- Board of Directors
- Chapters
-
Committees
-
ACRL 2027 Coordinating Committee
- ACRL 2027 Contributed Papers Committee
- ACRL 2027 Invited Presentations Committee
- ACRL 2027 Keynotes and Community ChatsCommittee
- ACRL 2027 Lightning Talks Committee
- ACRL 2027 Local Arrangements Committee
- ACRL 2027 Panel Sessions Committee
- ACRL 2027 Poster Sessions Committee
- ACRL 2027 Roundtable Discussions Committee
- ACRL 2027 Scholarships Committee
- ACRL 2027 Virtual Conference Committee
- ACRL 2027 Workshops Committee
- ACRL Diversity Alliance Committee
- Academic or Research Librarian of the Year Award
- Appointments Committee
- Awards Coordinating Committee
- Budget & Finance Committee
- Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee
- Excellence in Academic Libraries Awards Committee
- External Liaisons Committee
- Government Relations Committee
- Hugh C. Atkinson Memorial Award Committee
- Immersion Program Committee
- Leadership Recruitment and Nomination Committee
- Membership Committee
- New Roles and Changing Landscapes Committee
- Professional Development Coordinating Committee
- Professional Values Committee
- Publications Coordinating Committee
- Research Planning and Review Committee
- Research and Scholarly Environment Committee
- Standards Committee
- Student Learning and Information Literacy Committee
- Value of Academic Libraries
-
ACRL 2027 Coordinating Committee
- Communities of Practice Assembly
-
Discussion Groups
- Asian, African, and Middle Eastern Studies Discussion Group
- Assessment Discussion Group
- Copyright Discussion Group
- First Year Experience Discussion Group
- Flourishing in Academic Libraries Discussion Group
- Heads of Public Services Discussion Group
- Human Resources and Organizational Development Discussion Group
- Image Resources Discussion Group
- Language and Linguistics Discussion Group
- Leadership Discussion Group
- Librarians from Very Small Academic Institutions Discussion Group
- Librarianship in For-Profit Educational Institutions Discussion Group
- Library EDI Committees Discussion Group
- Library Marketing and Outreach Discussion Group
- Privacy Literacy Discussion Group
- Research Assessment and Metrics Discussion Group
- Scholarly Communication Discussion Group
- Sensory-Friendly Libraries Discussion Group
- Training & Equity in Library Work Discussion Group
-
Editorial Boards
- ACRL/Core Interdivisional Academic Library Facilities Survey Editorial Board
- Academic Library Trends and Statistics Survey
- C&RL News
- C&RL
- CHOICE
- New Publications Advisory
- Project Outcome for Academic Libraries Editorial Board
- Publications in Librarianship
- RBM
- Resources for College Libraries
- Threshold Achievement Test for Information Literacy (TATIL) Editorial Board
-
Interest Groups
- Academic Library Services for Graduate Students Interest Group
- Academic Library Services to International Students
- Access Services Interest Group
- African-American Studies Librarians Interest Group
- Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) Interest Group
- Contemplative Pedagogy Interest Group
- Digital Badges Interest Group
- Evidence Synthesis Methods Interest Group
- Health Sciences Interest Group
- History Librarians Interest Group
- Residency Interest Group
- Technical Services Interest Group
- Universal Accessibility Interest Group
- Virtual Worlds Interest Group
- President's Page
- Representatives Assembly
-
Sections
-
Anthropology & Sociology
- ANSS Anthropology Librarians Discussion Group
- ANSS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- ANSS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- ANSS Criminal Justice/Criminology Discussion Group
- ANSS Instruction and Information Literacy Committee
- ANSS Liaison Committee
- ANSS Membership Committee
- ANSS Nominating 2026 Committee
- ANSS Nominating 2027 Committee
- ANSS Publications Committee
- ANSS Resource Review and Bibliography Committee
- ANSS Review and Planning Committee
- ANSS Sociology Librarians Discussion Group
- ANSS Subject and Bibliographic Access Committee
- Arts Section
- College Libraries
-
Community and Junior College Libraries Section
- CJCLS Awards Committee
- CJCLS Committee on Library Staff Education
- CJCLS Communications Committee
- CJCLS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- CJCLS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- CJCLS Membership Committee
- CJCLS Mentoring Program Committee
- CJCLS Nominating 2026 Committee
- CJCLS Nominating 2027 Committee
- CJCLS OER Committee
- CJCLS Scholarly Research Committee
-
Digital Scholarship
- DSS Advisory Group
- DSS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- DSS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- DSS Data Information Literacy Discussion Group
- DSS Digital Collections Discussion Group
- DSS Digital Humanities Discussion Group
- DSS Digital Scholarship Centers Discussion Group
- DSS Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee
- DSS Liaison Committee
- DSS Membership Committee
- DSS Nominating 2025 Committee
- DSS Nominating 2026 Committee
- DSS Numeric and Geospatial Data Services Discussion Group
- DSS Open Research Discussion Group
- DSS Outreach Committee
- DSS Professional Development Committee
- DSS Research Data Management Discussion Group
- DSS ResearchDataQ Editorial Board
- DSS Visualization Discussion Group
-
Distance and Online Learning
- DOLS Anti-racism and EDI Committee
- DOLS Awards Committee
- DOLS Communications Committee
- DOLS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- DOLS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- DOLS Discussion Group
- DOLS Instruction Committee
- DOLS Membership and Events Committee
- DOLS Mentoring and Networking Committee
- DOLS Nominating 2026 Committee
- DOLS Nominating 2027 Committee
- DOLS Research and Publications Committee
- DOLS Standards Committee
- DOLS Strategic Planning Committee
- DOLS Web Committee
- Education and Behavioral Sciences
-
European Studies
- ESS Cataloging Issues Discussion Group
- ESS Classical, Medieval, and Renaissance Discussion Group
- ESS College and Medium-Sized Libraries Discussion Group
- ESS Conference Program Planning--2025 Committee
- ESS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- ESS General Membership Discussion Group
- ESS Germanists Discussion Group
- ESS Membership Committee
- ESS Nominating 2026 Committee
- ESS Nominating 2027 Committee
- ESS Publications Committee
- ESS Research and Planning Committee
- ESS Romance Languages Discussion Group
- ESS Scandinavian Discussion Group
- ESS Slavic & Eastern European Discussion Group
- ESS Slavic Cataloging and Metadata Committee
- ESS Vendor Relations Committee
-
Instruction Section
- ACRL/IS Roles & Strengths of Teaching Librarians Review & Revision Task Force
- IS Advisory Council
- IS Awards Coordinating Committee
- IS Communication Committee
- IS Featured Online Learning Objects Committee
- IS Framework for Information Literacy Sandbox Committee
- IS Ilene F. Rockman Instruction Publication of the Year Award Committee
- IS Inclusive Pedagogy Commitee
- IS Information Gathering and Exchange Committee
- IS Information Literacy Best Practices Committee
- IS Information Literacy in the Disciplines Committee
- IS Innovation Award Committee
- IS Instructional Technologies Committee
- IS Management and Leadership Committee
- IS Membership Committee
- IS Mentoring Program Committee
- IS Miriam Dudley Instruction Librarian Award Committee
- IS Nominating 2026 Committee
- IS Nominating 2027 Committee
- IS Research and Scholarship Committee
- IS Standards for Proficiencies for Instruction Librarians and Coordinators Revision Task Force
- IS Teaching Methods Committee
- IS Virtual Engagement Committee
- Literatures in English Section
-
Politics, Policy and International Relations
- ACRL/PPIRS AI Literacy Discussion Group
- PPIRS Communication and Publications Committee
- PPIRS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- PPIRS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- PPIRS Marta Lange/SAGE-CQ Press Award Committee
- PPIRS Membership Committee
- PPIRS Nominating 2026 Committee
- PPIRS Nominating 2027 Committee
- PPIRS Preparedness & Security Discussion Group
- PPIRS Professional Development Committee
- PPIRS Review and Planning Committee
- PPIRS Vendor/Publisher Liaison and Review Committee
-
Rare Books & Manuscripts
- RBMS Archivist
- RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee
- RBMS Budget and Development Committee
- RBMS Collection Development Discussion Group
- RBMS Conference Development Committee
- RBMS Conference Local Arrangements--2026 Committee
- RBMS Conference Local Arrangements--2027 Committee
- RBMS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- RBMS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- RBMS Controlled Vocabularies Editorial Group
- RBMS Curators and Conservators Discussion Group
- RBMS Diversity Committee
- RBMS Exhibition Awards Committee
- RBMS Instruction and Outreach Committee
- RBMS Manuscript & Other Formats Discussion Group
- RBMS Membership and Professional Development Committee
- RBMS Nominating 2026 Committee
- RBMS Nominating 2027 Committee
- RBMS Public Services Discussion Group
- RBMS Publications and Communications Committee
- RBMS Scholarships Committee
- RBMS Security Committee
- RBMS Technical Services Discussion Group
-
Science & Technology
-
Science and Technology Section (STS)
-
Committees
- ACRL/STS Structure and Responsibilities Implementation Task Force
- STS Awards Committee
- STS College Science Librarians Committee
- STS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- STS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- STS Council
- STS Data Committee
- STS Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Committee
- STS Government Information Committee
- STS Hot Topics Committee
- STS Information Literacy Committee
- STS Liaisons Committee
- STS Membership and Recruitment Committee
- STS Nominating 2026 Committee
- STS Nominating 2027 Committee
- STS Organization and Planning Committee
- STS Professional Development Committee
- STS Publications Committee
- STS Publisher/Vendor Relations Committee
- STS Research Committee
- STS STEMM Librarianship Resources Committee
- STS Scholarly Communication Committee
- Conferences
- Get Involved
- Publications
- STS Manual
-
Committees
-
Science and Technology Section (STS)
-
University Libraries
- ULS Academic Libraries Topics & Trends Discussion Group
- ULS Academic Outreach Committee
- ULS Awards Committee
- ULS Campus Administration and Leadership Discussion Group
- ULS Communications Committee
- ULS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- ULS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- ULS Future of University Libraries Discussion Group
- ULS Membership Committee
- ULS Mid-Level Managers Discussion Group
- ULS Nominating 2026 Committee
- ULS Nominating 2027 Committee
- ULS Procedures Committee
- ULS Professional Development Committee
- ULS Technology in University Libraries Committee
-
Women & Gender Studies
- WGSS Awards Committee
- WGSS Collections Committee
- WGSS Conference Program Planning--2026 Committee
- WGSS Conference Program Planning--2027 Committee
- WGSS Instruction Committee
- WGSS Membership Committee
- WGSS Nominating 2026 Committee
- WGSS Nominating 2027 Committee
- WGSS Publications & Communications Committee
- WGSS Research Committee
-
Anthropology & Sociology
-
Task Forces
- ACRL AI Competencies for Library Workers Task
- ACRL Communities of Practice Implementation Task Force
- ACRL Communities of Practice Review Task Force
- ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education Review and Revision Task Force
- ACRL/RBMS-SAA Joint Task Force for the Revision of the Guidelines for Primary Source Literacy
- ACRL/RBMS-SAA Joint Task Force on the Revision of the Art and Rare Materials BIBFRAME Ontology Extension
- National Student Engagement Survey Information Literacy Module Review Task Force
- Elections
- History
- Press Center
- Staff List
- ACRL Strategic Planning
- Advocacy & Issues
-
Awards & Scholarships
-
Achievement and Distinguished Service Awards
- ACRL Academic/Research Librarian of the Year Award
- ACRL Excellence in Academic Libraries Award
- CLS Innovation in College Libraries Award
- CJCLS Community College Library Leadership Award
- CJCLS Community College Library Program Award
- EBSS Distinguished Education and Behavioral Sciences Librarian Award
- Instruction Section Innovation Award
- Instruction Section Miriam Dudley Instruction Librarian Award
- PPIRS Marta Lange Award
- DOLS Distance Learning Librarianship Award
- ULS Outstanding Professional Development Award
- Publication Awards
- Research Awards and Grants
- Scholarship Opportunities
-
Achievement and Distinguished Service Awards
- Conferences & Learning
- Guidelines, Standards, and Frameworks
- Member Center
-
Professional Tools
- Academic Library Building Design
- ALA JobLIST
- Benchmark: Library Metrics and Trends
- Communication and Idea Sharing
- Consulting Services
- Index to ACRL Section Resources
- Pandemic Resources for Academic Libraries
- Personnel - New Position Descriptions
- Project Outcome
- Recruiting to the Profession
- TATIL
- Toolkits
- Publications
A number of white papers, position statements, reports from ACRL and ALA units, and the like have been produced over the years and published online. Below is a list of these items, which will continue to grow to reflect the work of the association and its members.
Official ACRL Guidelines, Standards, and Frameworks can be found in the Guidelines, Standards, and Frameworks area of this site.
Areas of Interest
Creating Sustainable Assessment Through Collaboration: A National Program Reveals Effective Practices (November 2017)
This occasional paper, published by the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, synthesizes the results of the ACRL program Assessment in Action: Academic Libraries and Student Success, which involved over 200 campus teams led by librarians designing, implementing, and evaluating an action-learning project that sought to strengthen the competencies of librarians in campus leadership and data-informed advocacy. The paper looks at the collaborative practices advanced by the AiA program and explains how these practices promote assessment aligned with institutional priorities, encourage common understanding among stakeholder groups about attributes of academic success, produce meaningful measures of student learning, create a unified campus message about student learning and success, and focus on transformative and sustainable change.
Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research (September 2017)
Developed for ACRL by OCLC Research, Academic Library Impact: Improving Practice and Essential Areas to Research investigates how libraries can increase student learning and success and effectively communicate their value to higher education stakeholders, and identifies the next generation of necessary research to continue to testify to library impact. This action-oriented research agenda includes a report on all project phases and findings; a detailed research agenda based on those findings; a visualization component that filters relevant literature and creates graphics that can communicate library value to stakeholders; a bibliography of the literature analyzed; and a full bibliography of the works cited and reviewed. This publication is also available for purchase in print through the ALA store. Learn more about the report in a recording of a free ACRL Presents webcast.
Academic Library Impact on Student Learning and Success: Findings from Assessment in Action Team Projects (April 2017)
This report synthesizes individual project reports from more than 50 campus teams which participated in the ACRL program Assessment in Action: Academic Libraries and Student Success from April 2015 to June 2016. Positive connections between the library and aspects of student learning and success in five areas are particularly noteworthy. These findings can be adapted to other settings with care and consideration to local context. Because the findings are derived from action research, which is situated in authentic institutional contexts, the results reflect “on the ground” practices in terms of resources available and campus priorities. Read the full report and share the executive summary broadly with campus stakeholders.
Documented Library Contributions to Student Learning and Success: Building Evidence with Team-Based Assessment in Action Campus Projects. (April 2016)
This report synthesizes more than 60 individual project reports from higher education institutions which participated in the second year of the ACRL program Assessment in Action: Academic Libraries and Student Success. Using past findings from projects completed during the first year of the program as context, the report identifies strong evidence of the positive contributions of academic libraries to student learning and success in four key areas. In addition the report reveals that a collaborative team-based approach on campus is an essential element of conducting an assessment project and planning for subsequent action. Read the full report and share the executive summary broadly with campus stakeholders.
Academic Library Contributions to Student Success: Documented Practices from the Field (January 2015)
This report synthesizes results from over 70 higher education institutions from across North America which completed team-based assessment projects during the first year of Assessment in Action: Academic Libraries and Student Success. The projects resulted in promising and effective approaches to demonstrating the library’s value to students’ academic success. The findings from these campus teams are impressive. By demonstrating the variety of ways that libraries contribute to student learning and success, academic librarians are establishing connections between such academic success outcomes as student retention, persistence, GPA, engagement, graduation, career preparedness, and different aspects of the library (e.g., instruction, reference, space and facilities, and collections).
Connect, Collaborate, and Communicate: A Report from the Value of Academic Libraries Summits (June 2012) (PDF)
A report on two invitational summits supported by a National Leadership Collaborative Planning Grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as part of ACRL's Value of Academic Libraries Initiative. The report – co-authored by Karen Brown, associate professor at Dominican University, and ACRL Senior Strategist for Special Initiatives Kara Malenfant – summarizes broad themes about the dynamic nature of higher education assessment that emerged from the summits. Additionally, listen to a conversation with Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe and Megan Oakleaf, co-chairs of ACRL’s Value of Academic Libraries committee, about the report. Press coverage: Chronicle of Higher Education and Library Journal.
Value of Academic Libraries: A Comprehensive Research Review and Report (September 2010)
A review of the quantitative and qualitative literature, methodologies and best practices currently in place for demonstrating the value of academic libraries, developed for ACRL by Megan Oakleaf of the iSchool at Syracuse University. The primary objective of this comprehensive review is to provide academic librarians with a clearer understanding of what research about the performance of academic libraries already exists, where gaps in this research occur, and to identify the most promising best practices and measures correlated to performance. Press coverage: Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed, and Library Journal.
What Chief Academic Officers Want from Their Libraries: Findings from interviews with Provosts and Chief Academic Officers (October 2007)
This is the central finding from a recent survey of Provosts and Chief Academic Officers conducted on behalf of the Association for College and Research Libraries by Leigh S. Estabrook and the University of Illinois
Task Force on Academic Library Outcomes Assessment Report (June 1998)
Report from ACRL's Task Force on Academic Library Outcomes Assessment, which includes suggestions for incorporating outcomes assessment into ACRL standards, as well as for using them in other contexts.
Sources of Information on Performance and Outcome Assessment (1997)
A list of sources compiled by ACRL's Standards and Accreditation Committee on the topic of Performance and Outcome Assessment.
Transforming Library Services for Computational Research with Text Data: Environmental Scan, Stakeholder Perspectives, and Recommendations for Libraries (August 2021)
This report from the IMLS National Forum on Data Mining Research Using In-Copyright and Limited-Access Text Datasets seeks to build a shared understanding of the issues and challenges associated with the legal and socio-technical logistics of conducting computational research with text data. It captures preparatory activities leading up to the forum and its outcomes to (1) provide academic librarians with a set of recommendations for action and (2) establish a research agenda for the LIS community.
Academic Libraries and Research Data Services: Current Practices and Plans for the Future (PDF)
This survey reports the findings of a cross section of academic libraries in the United States and Canada to provide a baseline assessment of the current state of and future plans for research data services in academic libraries. Recently the academic library community has identified data curation as one of the top ten trends in 2012. Some academic libraries are already engaged in these activities, and others are examining ways they can best provide a range of research data services. As science becomes more collaborative, data-intensive, and computational, academic researchers are faced with a range of data management needs. Combine these needs with funding directives that require data management planning, and there is both a need and an imperative for research data services in colleges and universities. Academic libraries may be ideal centers for research data service activities on campuses, providing unique opportunities for academic libraries to become even more active participants in the knowledge creation cycle in their institution.
2025 ACRL Environmental Scan (March 2025) (PDF)
Every two years, the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee releases an environmental scan of higher education, including developments with the potential for continuing impact on academic libraries. The 2025 environmental scan provides a broad review of the current higher education landscape, with special focus on the state of academic and research libraries. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, including the Top Trends in Academic Libraries. The 2025 environmental scan is freely available on the ACRL website (PDF).
2024 Top Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2024)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future.
2023 ACRL Environmental Scan (March 2023) (PDF)
Every two years, the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee releases an environmental scan of higher education, including developments with the potential for continuing impact on academic libraries. The 2023 environmental scan provides a broad review of the current higher education landscape, with special focus on the state of academic and research libraries. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, including the Top Trends in Academic Libraries. The 2023 environmental scan is freely available on the ACRL website (PDF).
2022 Top Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2022)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future.
2021 ACRL Environmental Scan (April 2021) (PDF)
Every two years, the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee releases an environmental scan of higher education, including developments with the potential for continuing impact on academic libraries. The 2021 environmental scan provides a broad review of the current higher education landscape, with special focus on the state of academic and research libraries. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, including the Top Trends in Academic Libraries. The 2021 environmental scan is freely available on the ACRL website (PDF).
2020 Top Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2020)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future.
2019 ACRL Environmental Scan (May 2019) (PDF)
Every two years, the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee releases an environmental scan of higher education, including developments with the potential for continuing impact on academic libraries. The 2019 environmental scan provides a broad review of the current higher education landscape, with special focus on the state of academic and research libraries. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, including the Top Trends in Academic Libraries. The 2019 environmental scan is freely available on the ACRL website (PDF).
2018 Top Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2018)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future.
NMC Horizon Report > 2017 Library Edition
This report describes annual findings from the NMC Horizon Project, a 15-year-old ongoing research project designed to identify and describe emerging technologies poised to influence learning, teaching, and creative inquiry. Six key trends, six significant challenges, and six important developments in educational technology are placed directly in the context of their likely impact on the core missions of academic and research libraries.
Environmental Scan 2017 (March 2017) (PDF)
The 2017 environmental scan by the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee explores the current atmosphere in the world of academic and research libraries along with trends that will define the future of academic and research librarianship and the research environment. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, identifying several emerging issues.
2016 Top Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2016)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future.
Environmental Scan 2015 (March 2015) (PDF)
The 2015 environmental scan by the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee explores the current atmosphere in the world of academic and research libraries along with trends that will define the future of academic and research librarianship and the research environment. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, identifying several emerging issues.
2014 Top Ten Trends in Academic Libraries (June 2014)
The ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee is responsible for creating and updating a continuous and dynamic environmental scan for the association that encompasses trends in academic librarianship, higher education, and the broader environment. As a part of this effort, the committee develops a list of the top ten trends that are affecting academic libraries now and in the near future. This list was compiled based on an extensive review of current literature and an e-mail survey that was sent to ACRL members in February 2014.
Environmental Scan 2013 (April 2013) (PDF)
The 2013 environmental scan by the ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee explores the current atmosphere in the world of academic and research libraries along with trends that will define the future of academic and research librarianship and the research environment. The document builds on earlier ACRL reports, identifying several emerging issues.
New Roles for the Road Ahead: Essays Commissioned for ACRL’s 75th Anniversary (March 2015) (PDF)
In this collection of essays commissioned for ACRL’s 75th Anniversary, authors Steven J. Bell, Lorcan Dempsey, and Barbara Fister share their thoughts on the world in which academic libraries will thrive, ways libraries are responding to change, and new roles for libraries and librarians. The essays include reflections on ways academic libraries can succeed in a changing higher education environment, take advantage of opportunities, and think about the best ways to deliver both ongoing and innovative services to students and faculty. These wide-ranging topics are bound by the singular understanding that action will need to be taken soon in order to stay current and relevant as ACRL celebrates its past successes and looks ahead to its future. The report also includes an introduction by Nancy H. Allen and afterword by Betsy Wilson.
Building with Purpose: A Quantitative Overview and Analysis of New U.S. Academic Library Construction, 2000–2014 (February 2015)
The first in a set of Occasional Reports on academic library construction and renovation. Authored by Christopher Stewart, this report presents a rich set of data on, and analysis of, new library construction over the past fourteen years.
Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians: Scenarios for the Future of the Book (May 2012) (PDF)
Many current conversations about the future of libraries assume that printed books will give way to e-books. This report by David J. Staley, Staley, director of the Harvey Goldberg Center for Excellence in Teaching in the History Department of Ohio State University, presents four alternate possible scenarios for the future, based in part on feedback from academic library directors. It includes scenarios which intentionally favor the continued existence of the printed book as a viable technology so that academic and research librarians may expand their thinking about the future to include a richer set of environmental conditions.
Futures Thinking for Academic Librarians: Higher Education in 2025 (June 2010) (PDF)
For academic librarians seeking to demonstrate the value of their libraries to their parent institutions, it is important to understand not only the current climate. We must also know what will be valued in the future so that we can begin to take appropriate action now. This document presents 26 possible scenarios based on an implications assessment of current trends, which may have an impact on all types of academic and research libraries over the next 15 years. They are organized in a “scenario space” visualization tool, reflecting the expert judgment of ACRL members as to their expectations and perceptions about the probability, impact, speed of change, and threat/opportunity potential of each scenario. The study draws out implications for academic libraries and includes an appendix with a suggested activity, also available as an editable document so that you may customize this activity for use in your library. Additionally, listen to a discussion with the report's authors about how to stretch your imagination and why considering possible futures is worthwhile.
Changing Roles of Academic and Research Libraries (February 2007)
Essay derived from a Roundtable on Technology and Change in Academic Libraries, convened by ACRL on November 2-3, 2006 in Chicago.
The Future of Higher Education: A View from CHEMA (August 2006)
A report presented by CHEMA and ECAR, with generous sponsorship from Carter & Burgess, Inc., and produced for CHEMA by APPA.
How Students Engage with News: Five Takeaways for Educators, Journalists, and Librarians (October 2018) (PDF)
This Project Information Literacy News Study research report presents findings about how a sample of U.S. college students gather information and engage with news in the digital age. Results are included from an online survey of 5,844 respondents and telephone interviews with 37 participants from 11 U.S. colleges and universities selected for their regional, demographic, and red/blue state diversity. A computational analysis was conducted using Twitter data associated with the survey respondents and a Twitter panel of 135,891 college-age people. Six recommendations are included for educators, journalists, and librarians working to make students effective news consumers. To explore the implications of this study’s findings, concise commentaries from leading thinkers in education, libraries, media research, and journalism are included.
Global Perspectives on Information Literacy: Fostering a Dialogue for International Understanding (March 2017) (PDF)
ACRL’s Student Learning and Information Literacy Committee (SLILC) has gathered information literacy experts from around the world—including Africa, Canada, Europe, Oceania, Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East—to explore information literacy from each author’s regional and/or cultural perspective and share individual international perspectives that demonstrate how information literacy is viewed, taught, and conceptualized internationally. The thirteen chapters examine research trends, models of information literacy, theory and practice, the role of librarians, and future visioning.
Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy: Creating Strategic Collaborations for a Changing Academic Environment (March 2013) (PDF)
Written by a working group of leaders from many parts of the ACRL, this white paper explores and articulates three intersections between scholarly communication and information literacy. The paper also provides strategies for librarians from different backgrounds to initiate collaborations within their own campus environments between information literacy and scholarly communication. The white paper explores and articulates three intersections between scholarly communication and information literacy, and provides strategies for librarians from different backgrounds to initiate collaborations within their own campus environments between information literacy and scholarly communication. "Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy" is also available in an interactive, online version to facilitate discussion.
A Progress Report on Information Literacy: An Update on the American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report (March 1998)
A follow-up report to the American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report outlining the progress made toward the meeting the recommendations put forth in the initial report.
Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report (January 1989)
This report from the Presidential Committee on Information Literacy called for more attention to information literacy at a time when many other learning deficiencies are being expressed by educators, business leaders, and parents and includes six recommendations for meeting information literacy needs.
Intellectual Freedom Principles for Academic Libraries: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights (June 1999)
This statement was created to provide an interpretation of general intellectual freedom principles in an academic library setting and, in the process, raise consciousness of the intellectual freedom context within which academic librarians work.
Achieving Racial and Ethnic Diversity among Academic and Research Librarians: The Recruitment, Retention, and Advancement of Librarians of Color (July 2007)
A White Paper by the ACRL Board of Directors Diversity Task Force, produced by Teresa Y. Neely, Ph.D. and Lorna Peterson, Ph.D.
Culture Keepers VI
A companion piece to the ACRL Diversity White Paper by Julie Todaro.
Open and Equitable Scholarly Communications: Creating a More Inclusive Future (June 2019)
On June 12, 2019, ACRL released “Open and Equitable Scholarly Communications: Creating a More Inclusive Future.” Developed over the course of a year with leadership from the Research and Scholarly Environment Committee (ReSEC) and with a high degree of community involvement, this powerful new action-oriented research agenda encourages the community to make the scholarly communications system more open, inclusive, and equitable by outlining trends, encouraging practical actions, and clearly identifying the most strategic research questions to pursue. This report is an important contribution to ACRL’s core commitment to equity, diversity and inclusion which includes valuing different ways of knowing and identifying and working to eliminate barriers to equitable services, spaces, resources, and scholarship. The full research agenda is freely available on the ACRL website as a PDF and for purchase in print in the ALA store. Learn more in an American Libraries feature, Choice Authority File podcast, or Scholarly Kitchen blog post. Watch the recording of a free ACRLPresents Webcast from Monday, July 15, 2019.
Environmental Scan of OERs, MOOCs, and Libraries: What Effectiveness and Sustainability Means for Libraries’ Impact on Open Education (March 2014) (PDF)
Authored by Carmen Kazakoff-Lane. Kazakoff-Lane (Extension Librarian at the Brandon University John E. Robbins Library in Brandon, Manitoba, Canada), this research report introduces and provides background on the open educational resources (OER) and massive open online course (MOOC) movements and investigates the effectiveness and challenges to sustainability of each. The report will be of interest to those who are seeking to learn about OERs and MOOCs, as well as to those for whom the roles of librarians in the realm of open education is an interest, and includes a substantial set of references for further investigation.
Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy: Creating Strategic Collaborations for a Changing Academic Environment (March 2013) (PDF)
Written by a working group of leaders from many parts of the ACRL, this white paper explores and articulates three intersections between scholarly communication and information literacy. The paper also provides strategies for librarians from different backgrounds to initiate collaborations within their own campus environments between information literacy and scholarly communication. The white paper explores and articulates three intersections between scholarly communication and information literacy. the paper provides strategies for librarians from different backgrounds to initiate collaborations within their own campus environments between information literacy and scholarly communication.
Establishing a Research Agenda for Scholarly Communication: A Call for Community Engagement (November 2007) (PDF)
This white paper, by ACRL's Scholarly Communications Committee, encourages academics, librarians and their key partners to gather more data on practices that both enable and inhibit the production of scholarship and its communication. The report results from a one-day invitational meeting to collectively brainstorm the evidence needed to manage and influence the changing system of scholarly communication. It identifies eight themes, with research possibilities in each area, and invites broad comment.
Stepping through the Open Door: A Forum on New Modes of Information Delivery in Higher Education (September 2007)
Report from an invitational forum, held March 5 and 6, 2007 in Denver, sponsored jointly by ACRL, EDUCAUSE and the National Association of College Stores.
Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication (June 2003)
Scholarly communication is the system through which research and other scholarly writings are created, evaluated for quality, disseminated to the scholarly community, and preserved for future use. The system includes both formal means of communication, such as publication in peer-reviewed journals, and informal channels, such as electronic discussion lists. This document addresses issues related primarily to the formal system of scholarly communication.