Cataloging Personnel, Education, and Training, 1999–2004
The education and training of catalogers are topics of serious concern to both practitioners and educators. The exponential growth of information resources, in particular electronic resources, is placing greater demands on the skills and knowledge of libraries’ cataloging personnel. Concurrent with the need to reassess and enhance training practices and to explore the options offered by the schools of library and information science (LIS) is the effect of the anticipated retirement of a significant number of the profession’s catalogers within the next decade. Consequently, the roles of degreed catalogers are changing and broadening to include management and training. Paraprofessional personnel and students are assuming responsibility for many of the tasks formerly reserved for professional catalogers, including original cataloging and authority work. This essay summarizes the research published in the literature from 1999 through the beginning of 2004, identifies some of the recent initiatives of professional organizations to address educational and training issues, and suggests some of the directions that future research might take.
The literature reflects the perspectives of catalogers, managers of cataloging and technical services operations, and LIS educators. Many articles are gathered in two issues of Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, edited by Hill (2002) and simultaneously published as a monograph. The authors express opinions about cataloging and cataloging education, report the findings of their research on aspects of cataloging education in LIS schools, and discuss processes of both traditional classroom instruction and distance education (including mentoring) for both new students and practicing catalogers. In one of the articles, Intner (2002) analyzes the recurring educational issues of theory vs. practice, of book and non-book cataloging, and of the best venue for training (in a formal educational setting, on the job, or on a continuing basis). In the final article in the collection, Hopkins (2002) addresses the education and training new catalogers can receive from more experienced colleagues in their own libraries and from catalogers afar via electronic discussion lists such as AUTOCAT. In a later two-part article, Hill (2004) discusses cataloging training from a recent historical perspective, current LIS education, continuing education, and the rationale for cataloging education.
Not only must catalogers be skilled in the complexities of the cataloging tools and standards that have long been in use, but they must also acquire the knowledge of new metadata schema to provide access to new types of materials in electronic and digital form. The curricula of LIS schools include new courses on metadata and electronic resources cataloging (Hsieh-Yee 2000, 2002, and 2004; Saye 2001 and 2002; and Park 2002) and the discussion of requirements of cataloging courses and theory vs. practice continues. Spillane (1999) examines LIS cataloging curricula from the mid-1980s through the late 1990s and finds a decline in required cataloging courses. Joudrey (2002) analyzes the cataloging curricula in 2000 and finds that even though traditional cataloging courses are declining the number of courses overall is increasing with the addition of new courses for non-book and electronic cataloging. Survey studies examine perceptions of three groups about cataloging courses and about the expectations of the knowledge entry-level catalogers should have: cataloging educators (Turvey and Letarte 2002), recent LIS graduates (Kovacs and Dayton 2002), cataloging practitioners (Letarte et al. 2002). All three studies found that most of the participants in the surveys think that the core competencies in the traditional cataloging tools are essential.
New technologies have engendered new methods for instructing cataloging students and a variety of distance educational techniques are in use. Cloete, Snyman, and Cronjé (2003) evaluate a training program that combines both media and the Internet in contact, distance, and in-service environments. Yontz (2002) employs an LIS distance education program, and Koh (2002) has developed an online mentoring process between LIS students and practicing catalogers.
Continuing education for practicing catalogers is a concerted effort among professional groups. Components of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) have for a number of years provided training for participating libraries. For serials cataloging training, Hirons (2000) describes the Series Cataloging Cooperative Training Program (SCCTP). Aspects of the successful SCCTP program have been examined from several perspectives: the manager’s (Bruner 2000), the trainer’s (Shetler 2000), and the trainee’s (Headlee 2000). Howarth (2000) evaluates the SCCTP as a general continuing education model. Hixson and Garrison (2002) discuss training programs of the PCC, including those for BIBCO, NACO, and SACO, for participating libraries. Catalogers involved in the PCC training programs have joined forces with ALCTS groups to develop workshops and preconferences on subject heading practice and name authority work for catalogers who are not in PCC participating institutions. ALCTS offers other workshops for electronic resources catalogers that have resulted from the work of the ALCTS Continuing Education Task Force (2003).
Within individual libraries, some have reported on their training programs that involve both staff and students. Fain, Brown, and Faix (2004) discuss the implementation and advantages of a cross-training program for public services librarians to perform cataloging operations. Puffer-Rothenberg (2003) describes an “incremental” approach to training cataloging staff for system migration that makes the transition more manageable by introducing new concepts and processes in steps. The ALCTS CCS Catalog Management Discussion Group devoted a session to the use of student assistants for managing the catalog and some methods for training them (Ballinger and Mrkich 2003).
Since 1999, the literature has seen numerous discussions, articles, and reports that have answered some questions about the directions and responsibilities that LIS schools and professional groups are taking. Further studies will help answer other questions: How should the effectiveness of the training programs that have been developed be measured? Are there ways to evaluate the success of the cataloging education provided by the LIS schools? What is the impact of new cataloging standards and evolving formats on cataloging personnel and on the management of personnel and projects? What effect will all the new software developments for cataloging tools and the interfaces to the bibliographic utilities have on training and workflows? What impact do they have on the organization of technical services? What new and innovative ways have cataloging departments developed to cope with all the changes?
ALCTS Task Force on Continuing Education. Cataloging for the 21st Century: A Proposal for Continuing Education for Cataloging Professionals, 2003. Accessed 30 March 2005, http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~chixson/cetf/CETFpublic.html.
Ballinger, Linda, and Francie Mrkich. “Student Assistants in Catalog Management: A Report of the ALCTS CCS Catalog Management Discussion Group,” American Library Association Annual Conference, Atlanta, June 2002. Technical Services Quarterly 20, no. 4 (2003): 69–72.
Bruner, David. “SCCTP Basic Serials Cataloging: A Manager's Perspective.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 30, no. 4 (2000): 5–12.
Cloete, Linda M., Retha Snyman, and J. C. Cronjé. “Training Cataloguing Students Using a Mix of Media and Technologies.” Aslib Proceedings 55 (2003): 223–33.
Fain, Margaret, Micheline Brown, and Allison Faix. “Cross-training Reference Librarians to Catalog.” Technical Services Quarterly 22, no. 1 (2004): 41–53.
Headlee, Patricia A. “A Trainee Perspective on the Basic Serials Cataloging Workshop.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 30, no. 4 (2000): 21–28.
Hill, Janet Swan, editor. Education for Cataloging and the Organization of Information: Pitfalls and the Pendulum. New York: Haworth Press, 2002. Also issued as: Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2-3 (2002).
Hill, Janet Swan. “Education and Training of Catalogers: Obsolete? Disappeared? Transformed? Parts 1-2.” Technicalities 24, no. 1 (2004): 1, 10–15; Technicalities 24, no. 2 (2004): 1, 9–13.
Hirons, Jean L. “SCCTP—Continuing Education for Continuing Resources.” The Serials Librarian 37, no. 4 (2000): 113–21.
Hixson, Carol G., and William A. Garrison. “The Program for Cooperative Cataloging and Training for Catalogers.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 3 (2002): 355–65.
Hopkins, Judith. “The Community of Catalogers: Its Role in the Education of Catalogers.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 3 (2002): 375–81.
Howarth, Lynne C. “(Re)Making the Serials Cataloger: The SCCTP within an Educational Framework.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 30, no. 4 (2000): 29–36.
Hsieh-Yee, Ingrid. “Organizing Internet Resources: Teaching Cataloging Standards and Beyond.” OCLC Systems & Services 16 (2000): 130–43.
———. “Cataloging and Metadata Education: Asserting a Central Role in Information Organization.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 203–22.
———. “Cataloging and Metadata Education in North American LIS Programs.” Library Resources & Technical Services 48 (2004): 59–68.
Intner, Sheila S. “Persistent Issues in Cataloging Education: Considering the Past and Looking toward the Future.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 15–29.
Joudrey, Daniel N. “A New Look at U.S. Graduate Courses in Bibliographic Control.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 59–101.
Koh, Gertrude S. “Innovations in Standard Classroom Instruction.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 3 (2002): 263–87.
Kovacs, Beatrice, and Nancy Dayton. “‘If I Knew Then What I Know Now’: UNCG LS Graduates' Perspectives on Cataloging Education.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 145–64.
Letarte, Karen M., Michelle R. Turvey, Dea Borneman, and David L. Adams. “Practitioner Perspectives on Cataloging Education for Entry-level Academic Librarians.” Library Resources & Technical Services 46 (2002): 11–22.
Park, Taemin Kim. “The Integration of Electronic Resources into Cataloging Instruction in the LIS Curriculum.” The Serials Librarian 41, no. 3/4 (2002): 57–72.
Puffer-Rothenberg, Maureen. “Training Copy Catalogers in Preparation for System Migration: An Incremental Approach.” Technical Services Quarterly 21, no. 1 (2003): 31–38.
Saye, Jerry D. “The Organization of Electronic Resources in the Library and Information Science Curriculum.” OCLC Systems & Services 17 (2001): 71–78.
———. “Where Are We and How Did We Get Here? Or, The Changing Place of Cataloging in the Library and Information Science Curriculum: Causes and Consequences.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 121–43.
Shetler, James D. “The Serials Cataloging Cooperative Training Program: A Trainer's Perspective.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 30, no. 4 (2000): 13–20.
Spillane, Jodi Lynn. “Comparison of Required Introductory Cataloging Courses, 1986 to 1998.” Library Resources & Technical Services 43 (1999): 223–30.
Turvey, Michelle R., and Karen M. Letarte. “Cataloging or Knowledge Management: Perspectives of Library Educators on Cataloging Education for Entry-level Academic Librarians.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 1/2 (2002): 165–87.
Yontz, Elaine. “When Donkeys Fly: Distance Education for Cataloging.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 34, no. 3 (2002): 299–310.
Prepared by Winslow Lundy, Catalog Librarian, University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries, email@example.com