This bibliography lists selected recent publications that discuss these aspects of access to information: cultural, economic, organization of data, legal and ethical, governmental, educational and scholarly, and library policy.

Issues in Access to Information: A Bibliography

Final Draft

Prepared by RUSA Access to Information Committee, July 2004


An Adober Acrobat version of this bibliography can be found under Related Files, below. The HTML version of the bibliography follows:

Issues in Access to Information:
A Bibliography

Introduction

What is access to information? In the simplest terms, we can say that if an individual with an information need is able to obtain information that satisfies the need, the individual has access to information. Our mission as librarians is to facilitate access to the greatest possible extent. However, when we begin to examine how access to information is provided, potential barriers to access emerge from all quarters.

Barriers to access can be technical in nature. Obsolete formats can be inaccessible without special preservation efforts. Digital media require careful implementation to ensure continued access. New technologies can offer expanded access by offering multiple language and media compatibility, but they must be carefully designed to meet their potential.

Persons with disabilities may face physical barriers when using information technology that assumes certain visual and manual abilities to operate. Physical barriers or mobility restrictions can prevent access to library buildings. Thoughtful use of new and old technology can minimize these barriers.

Cultural barriers may prevent underrepresented groups from obtaining information or making their own views known. New technology has the potential to create new information communities, but it may also strengthen cultural barriers.

Economic barriers arise when information is too costly to obtain. Libraries have traditionally subsidized access to textual and electronic materials, but budgetary constraints and technological change present new problems and opportunities in maintaining access. Informed policy can address information inequality arising from economic sources.

The organization of information is an essential element of information access. Print and electronic information needs to be organized so that it can be easily found and understood. Librarians are bringing their invaluable skills in information organization to the electronic world.

Access to scholarly and educational information is under pressure as the global production of information expands. Economic constraints and technological change are combining to restructure the universe of scholarly information. Scholarly communication can occur in a multitude of forums including, but not limited to, conferences, class discussions, and electronic & print publications.

Legal, ethical and philosophical concerns affect information access. Open access must be balanced against privacy rights and defended from censorship. Ethical and legal principles must be adapted to keep these forces in balance as technology alters information distribution.

Access to government information is a special area of concern. The principles of open access that gave rise to the Federal Depository Library program needs to be revised and reinforced in an age of Internet information distribution.

Finally, library policy must confront these potential barriers and offer guidance on how libraries can maximize access to information.

This bibliography lists selected recent publications that discuss these aspects of access to information.

Technical Barriers

Byers, Fred R. (2003). Care and Handling of CDs and DVDs: A Guide for Librarians and Archivists. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved July 13, 2004, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub121/pub121.pdf
The title says it all. The author offers guidance on prolonging the lifespan of CDs and DVDs. A handy table lists the optimal temperatures for each type of optical disk.

Practical Experiences in Digital Preservation, 2 - 4 April, 2003. Kew, UK: National Archives and International Council on Archives. Retrieved July 13, 2004, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/preservation/news/conference/default.htm
Conference speakers described the ongoing efforts in various countries to preserve digital material as well as reasons for the need to do so. The various types of storage format and digital files also received much attention. Conference proceedings are available in both audio and visual format.

Preserving Our Digital Heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program. (2002). Retrieved July 13, 2004, from http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/repor/ndiipp_plan.pdf and http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/repor/ndiipp_appendix.pdf
In response to a Congressional mandate, the Library of Congress issued this report about the long-term storage and preservation of digital content. A series of meetings were conducted among representatives of various industries which had compelling interest in preserving digital data. The Library conducted background research on the issues involved and defined the components of the digital preservation infrastructure. Plans for action to be undertaken by the Library are outlined in the report.

Physical Barriers

Hudson, Laura. (2002). A New Age of Accessibility. Library Journal netConnect, 19-21.
The article explains federal standards that library can use to make web sites accessible to users with disabilities. Disabilities covered include vision, hearing, and mobility disabilities, cognitive impairments and seizure disorders. Hudson provides a list of Web sites with complementary information.

Mates, Barbara T. (2000). Adaptive Technology for the Internet: making electronic resources accessible to all. Chicago: American Library Association.
This book covers technologies for the visually, hearing and physically impaired. Included are chapters from funding sources, staff training and publicizing services.

McDermott, Irene E. (2001). Curb Cuts on the Information Superhighway: Making the Web Accessible. Searcher, 9(3) 65-69.
The author provides an extensive list of Web sites that promote accessible design, appropriate software, and standards for information technology.

McNulty, Tom. (Ed). (1999). Accessible Libraries on Campus: A Practical Guide for the Creation of Disability Friendly Libraries. Chicago: American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries.
Essays cover issues such as disability in higher education, services for patrons with hearing loss or deafness, creating web pages accessible to visually impaired users, and more. Appendices include profiles of noteworthy access programs and projects for librarians who want to assess users' needs and expectations, and a directory of resources.

Cultural Barriers

Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. (1999). Retrieved June 16, 2004, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html
This government study of internet usage in the United States includes data on access by racial and economic categories. The study shows that, “When holding income constant, Black and Hispanic households are still far less likely to have Internet access.” Implications for librarians are discussed, such as the greater likelihood (1.91 times more likely) that Black Americans will use the internet at their public libraries than White Americans.

Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2000). The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3).  Retrieved June 16, 2004, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue3/hoffman.html
This paper traces how race impacts usage of the internet over time, in contrast to the authors’ previous study which looked at internet usage at a single point in time, and also takes into consideration income and education of computer users. The data shows that despite government pushes to close the digital divide, “the overall gap between whites and African Americans in Internet access and having ever used the Internet have actually increased over time.”

Hull, B. (2001). Can librarians help to overcome the social barriers to access? New Library World, 102(10), 382-388.
Hull reports on a study conducted in the UK on the use of libraries for lifelong learning that showed greater library usage by students from non-traditional backgrounds. The author recommends an increased emphasis on cultural sensitivity and good interpersonal skills in the training of future librarians.

Economic Barriers

Drew, T. C. (2002). Addressing the global digital divide and its impact on educational opportunity. Educational Media International, 39(3/4), 211-222.
The author describes the digital divide as one aspect of the increasing gap between the rich and the poor worldwide. Causes of digital divide relate to culture, language, poverty, infrastructure, bureaucracy, corruption and protectionism.

Stueart, R. D. (2000). The economic crisis and challenges in accessing science and technological information in Asia. IFLA Journal, 26(2), 107-111.
The author reports that the greatest threat to access for libraries in Asia is not the technology itself, but rather the cost, pricing, policies and regulations involved. The greatest frustration for professionals is in attempting to find full text of scientific and technical information cited in bibliographic databases. The full texts are outside the financial grasp of most Asian libraries.

Young, P. R. (1994). Changing information access economies: New roles for libraries and librarians. Information Technology & Libraries, 13(2), 103-114.
The article focuses on the changes in the economic structure of library and information services and their implications for library policies. The shift from ‘fee’ or ‘free’ services to broader global policy concerns is mentioned.

Organization of Information

Allert, Jeann L. (2001). A 12-Step (or so) Program for Information Junkies. Training & Development, 55(1), 32-36.
Allert proposes ways for end-users to deal with “information fatigue syndrome” and offers all information specialists tools and suggestions to organize and access information effectively.

Bertot, John Carlo, & McClure, Charles R. (2003). Outcomes Assessment in the Networked Environment: Research Questions, Issues, and Moving Forward. Library Trends, 51(4), 590-613.
The authors identify factors in the networked environment of information that help librarians measure outcomes and assess the methods they use to evaluate the success of their work.

Fast, Karl V., & Campbell, D. Grant. (2001). The Ontological Perspectives of the Semantic Web and the Metadata Harvesting Protocol: Applications of Metadata for Improving Web Search. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Sciences, 26(4), 5-19.
This is a highly technical investigation of utilizing metadata to maximize results in searching the web for desired information.

Thilmany, Jean. (2003). Too Much Information. Mechanical Engineering, 125(6), 44-46.
Although written for professional engineers, this article highlights important areas of information organization that have particular relevance for librarians seeking the most effective ways to organize information in a user-friendly way.

Scholarly & Educational Aspects

Dilevko, J., & Grewal, K. (1997). A New Approach to Collection Bias in Academic Libraries: The Extent of Corporate Control in Journal Holdings. Library & Information Science Research, 19(4), 359-385.
The authors suggest an alternative method of measuring socio-political bias in journal collections, in which the publisher is categorized as either corporate or small. Using this method, the authors conclude that Canadian academic libraries hold a much higher percentage of mainstream, corporate-publisher journals than small-publisher journals. Electronic access to full text journals provides even greater differentiation in holdings by type of publisher. Since marginalized populations are more likely to have journals devoted to their viewpoints published by small publishers, the disparate subscription rates of corporate and small publishers’ journals are of particular significance in providing access to alternative points of view.

Mann, T. (2001). The Importance of Books, Free Access, and Libraries as Places—and the Dangerous Inadequacy of the Information Science Paradigm. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(4), 268-281.
Libraries should view access to copyrighted materials—mainly books and licensed databases—as their primary mission. The book format presents content as coherent whole entities, facilitating knowledge and understanding levels of awareness rather than just the data and information levels. Restrictions of place for books or person for databases should be viewed as strengths of libraries because they allow access to material that otherwise would not be available except at significant cost.

Moran, G. (1992). Academic Librarians and Mediation in Controversial Scholarly Communication. Reference Librarian, 17(37), 183-196.
Librarians can play a significant role in identifying, indexing, cataloging and creating bibliographies of information on various viewpoints of a scholarly controversy. Librarians’ role may be particularly important when the academic peer review process attempts to suppress information regarding research errors.

Legal, Ethical & Philosophical Aspects

Floridi, Luciano. (2002) Informational Ethics: An Environmental Approach to the Digital Divide. Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 9(1), 39-45. Retrieved April 26, 2004, from http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/pdf/ieeadd.pdf
Floridi discusses the idea of the digital divide as being an ethical question of great importance to society. He argues that we need to fight “any kind of destruction, corruption, pollution, depletion. . . or unjustified closure of [information]. . . . The ethical use of [information] and the sustainable development of an equitable information society need a safe and public infosphere for all, where communication and collaboration can flourish, coherently with the application of civil rights, legal requirements and the fundamental freedoms of the media.”

Hollaar, Lee A. (2002). Legal Protection of Digital Information. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
The book contains excerpts from relevant cases and makes excellent use of legislative history materials. In fact, it is the use of the legislative history reports that distinguish this book from others in the field. As a person who was intimately involved with the adoption of many of these laws, Hollaar has brought in excellent resources such as the recommendations of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU) and the Information Infrastructure Task Force’s white paper on copyright and the Internet. The House and Senate reports accompanying the 1976 revision of the copyright act contain a wealth of information that is not often tapped.

Peace, A., and Hartzel, K. (2002). Ethical Concerns Raised by the Use of the Internet in Academia. Journal of Information Ethics, 11(2), 17-32.
This article discusses some of the issues that result from the use of information technology in higher education. Among the issues mentioned are intellectual property rights, privacy issues, freedom of speech and censorship, accessibility of information technology, and accuracy. The authors suggest that academic institutions must look at these issues and create appropriate policies.

Reynolds, Tom K. (2002). Collateral Damage: Information, Intellectual Freedom, and the War on Terrorism. Alki, 18(2), 28-30.
This article discusses some of the changes that have taken place in libraries as a result of the attacks of September 11 and the war on terrorism. The author writes about the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and related anti-terrorism measures, along with a description of the hearings on the passage of the act.

Wengert, Robert G. (2002). Some Ethical Aspects of Being an Information Professional. Library Trends, 50 (4), 486-509.
This article discusses some of the ethical issues that the Internet has brought to the forefront. The author shows how these ethical debates touch libraries, and talks about some of the consequences. The article also talks about the ALA Code of Ethics, and about the rights of individuals.

Government Information

Pierce, Jennifer Burek. (2003). What Ails Access to Government Health Information? American Libraries, 34(11), 58-63.
Information on government health and science web sites have been removed or altered, prompting concerns from numerous groups including library associations and nonprofit organizations. The article lists specific examples of displaced content. Reasons given for withdrawal or alteration of online material include homeland security and unsubstantiated data.

Shuler, John A. (2003). Citizen-centered Government: Information Policy Possibilities for the 108th Congress. Journal of Academic Librarianship 29(2), 107-110.
Shuler suggests that the E-government Act of 2002 will change the traditional paradigm of the federal depository library and argues that librarians need to work with government agencies to maintain public access to government information. Librarians should focus on ensuring that federal agencies are keeping archival copies of electronically distributed material.

Smith, Ted D. (2002). Security versus Freedom of Information: An Enduring Conflict in Federal Information Policy. OLA Quarterly, 8(4), 2-6.
This article discusses the balance between the government’s roles as disseminator of public information and protection of national security. In the post-911 world, this balance has become especially delicate for the Government Publications Office and the Federal Depository Library Program. The author details the situation and makes recommendations.

West, Darrell M. (2000). Assessing E-Government: The Internet, Democracy, and Service Delivery by State and Federal Governments.  Retrieved January 5, 2004, from http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovtreport00.html
Results of a study that surveyed state and federal information officers and analyzed government web sites. Tables offer data such as the percentages of government websites offering disability access, language translation, privacy policy, and as well as the response rate to public inquiries.

Library Policy

Access to Electronic Information, Services and Networks: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights.  Adopted by the ALA Council, January 24, 1996. Retrieved July 12, 2004, from http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/statementspols/statementsif/interpretations/accesstoelectronic.pdf

Carson, Bryan M. (2002). Surveying Privacy: Library Privacy Laws in the Southeastern U.S. The Southeastern Librarian, 49(3-4), 19-28. Retrieved June 16, 2004, from http://sela.lib.ucf.edu/SoutheasternLibrarian/FallWinter2001.pdf
This article summarizes and discusses library privacy laws in the states of Kentucky, West Virginia, Virginia, Tennessee, the Carolinas, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and the District of Columbia. The author touches on Federal legislation that has had an impact on privacy of library information, including FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act). Also mentioned is the impact of the U.S.A. PATRIOT Act on library privacy from the viewpoint of criminal law and search warrants. The author was a criminal defense lawyer before becoming a librarian, and this was the first peer-reviewed article to analyze the constitutional implications of the PATRIOT Act in terms of the Search & Seizure provisions of the Fourth Amendment.

Richey, Cynthia K. (2002). Molding Effective Internet Policies. Computers in Libraries, 22(6), 16-21.
The author describes the process her library underwent in developing an Internet policy that would address Internet access, community concerns, and protect the library. She stresses the importance of training staff, enforcing the policy, and educating parents.

Shuler, John A.  (2002). Freedom of Public Information Versus the Right to Public Information: The Future Possibilities of Library Advocacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 157-159.
The author gives details and examples of some of the issues that libraries need to be aware of in order to be good advocates for public information.