
The following results are for questions asked in April, 1997. Some or all of the four questions were answered by 897 libraries; the number responding to each question is given in parentheses below. In all cases the percentage of respondents column totals more than 100% because respondents could check more than one answer.
| Percentage of respondents |
|
|---|---|
| None | 65.7 |
| some support staff | 9.2 |
| all support staff | 20.3 |
| some professional staff | 12.7 |
| all professional staff | 16.4 |
The number of libraries where all staff (both all support staff and all professional staff) are covered by a collective bargaining agreement is 108 (12%).
| Percentage of respondents |
|
|---|---|
| pay for performance/merit based system | 42.3 |
| across-the-board cost of living adjustments | 61.7 |
| variable pay (system varies with type of work) | 16.6 |
| other | 24.4 |
Of those who specified "other," 92 were from academic libraries. Thirty-four (34) of them mentioned a schedule based on various factors and 15 of the 34 noted that it was the same as the faculty schedule. Union contracts were mentioned by 29 academic respondents. Only three mentioned market factors. Of the 116 public library respondents who specified "other," 37 mentioned some kind of salary schedule and 33 mentioned a union contract. Market factors were noted by four respondents from public libraries.
| Percentage of respondents |
|
|---|---|
| sabbaticals/time off | 28.2 |
| bonuses/incentives | 8.4 |
| job enrichment | 16.0 |
| awards programs | 9.8 |
| team-based pay | .5 |
| Other | 11.4 |
| none of the above | 49.4 |
Most frequently mentioned as "other" forms of compensation were professional development/continuing education funds (14 mentions), conference/travel funds (11) and tuition reimbursement (11).
Only 62 respondents answered "yes" to question 4 and no clear pattern could be observed in the explanations provided.