
By Richard W. Boss
Selecting software for children—pre-school through age 11---and promoting it's use is a challenge. It is not just a matter of finding software that meets the criteria set by librarians, but also that which children will choose to use. Interviews by the author with a score of randomly selected children’s librarians in mid-size public libraries revealed that fewer than 20 percent of the titles favorably reviewed in 2005 are very popular with children. The children’s librarians explained that children tend to choose the software that features characters they recognize from books, videos, or films. When they see familiar icons, they click on them, rather than on the unfamiliar ones.
Name recognition may lead a child to a product, but will not interest him or her very long if it lacks fun, the graphics and/or animation are poor, it is difficult to control minute on-screen movements with a mouse, or there is some other difficulty with
use.
Children differ in the rate of their development in several different areas. For that reason, any selector of educational software for children should do some background reading in child development; and any selection criteria must be developed and applied not just on the basis of age, but also differences attributable to socio-economic conditions. The major areas of child development are:
After examining the selection criteria used by several reviewing media and talking with children’s librarians, the author has developed the following composite list of selection criteria:
Given the importance of “fun” in software programs, it is important to involve children in the selection process. While it is not practical to involve children in the screening of the many hundreds of software programs that become available each year, it is practical to involve them in the final step of selection.
There are four steps in the selection process:
(1) an examination of distributors’ and publishers’ announcements
(2) a consultation of review media
(3) obtaining review copies
(4) reviewing of programs
Each year there are as many as 1,000 new or revised software programs for children. It is not realistic to obtain review copies or even to read reviews of this many titles. The first cut of up to 90 percent of the titles should be based on the descriptions in the catalogs and announcements. The remaining titles can then be checked in the various reviewing media.
The majority of review media target parents or both parents and teachers/librarians. Only some review media involve children, therefore, recommended products may not be popular with children. Among the reviewing tools librarians use regularly are the Association of Library Service to Children’s ALSC Notable Computer Software for Children, Children’s
Technology Review, Learning Village Software Guide, Parent Channel, and SuperKids
Educational Software Review.
ALSC Notable Computer Software for Children (google the title as the URL is nearly 50 characters long) annually reviews and recommends approximately twenty software programs that meet its criteria—criteria that are similar to those set forth in this TechNote. The reviewers are children’s librarians. An archive of past years’ notable software is available back to 1996. The method used for software to be considered changes from time to time, but typically it consists of submissions by publishers and research by committee members using catalogs and lists. Software that is simple drilland-
response or that is strictly recreational is not included.
Children’s Technology Review. (www.childrensoftware.com) is a monthly, advertising-free, review publication of both educational and recreational software and other media. Up to 50 titles suitable for children up to age 15 are reviewed by educators and librarians for each issue. The archive contains more than 7,300 reviews back to 1985. There is a “Top 100 Educational Interactive Media Product for Classrooms Settings” available on the Web site. The subscription is available in PDF or print form at a cost of $96 per year. Subscribers are also given access to the online database.
Learning Village Software Guide (www.learningvillage.com) is an online database of approximately 60 brief reviews grouped by age levels up to age 12 and by broad subjects such as math, music, science, social studies, and visual arts. The
reviewers are Canadian educators.
The Parent Channel, a unit of television’s Discover Channel (http://school.discover.com/parents/reviewcorner/softwareevaluation), evaluates several product categories, one of them educational software. The evaluation criteria are posted on the Website. While they are very similar to those mentioned in this TechNote, the emphasis is on software that appeals to a child’s humanitarian qualities. The reviewers are parents and children. Products are rated on a 5-star system, with those rated with a 4.5 or 5.0 star rating receiving an Award of Excellence. The reviews, several hundred in number, are accessible alphabetically, by publisher, and by interest area.
SuperKids Educational Software Review (www.superkids.com) is only available online. It is published by a privately held company that derives its revenue from advertisers. The reviewers are educators, parents, and children. The review database is accessible by new reviews, a subject index, a title index, and a publisher index. The Website includes a sample of the form reviewers are asked to use in their evaluation.
For a listing of other educational software reviewing media consult Educational Software Reviews (www.educational-software-directory.net/reviews.html).
Unfortunately, many distributors and publishers are reluctant to provide copies for review. They fear that the programs may be copied during the review process. Libraries with branches can usually afford to purchase a review copy and order additional copies of the titles they select. Small libraries may lack the financial resources to purchase review copies. They should, therefore, consider forming cooperatives for the purchase of review of children’s software. Another option for small libraries is to go to a nearby large public library or school that has an extensive children’s software collection. There are also a few state library agencies that obtain copies for evaluation for the benefit of libraries in their states.
It is in this step that the participation of children in the selection is highly desirable. Children often react differently to software programs than adults, even adults who regularly work with children. SuperKids.Educational Software Review, which uses panels made up of both children and adults, has found that the children often assign much lower ratings to programs than the adults. Having children review the programs with someone who interacts well with children and who can ask questions about what is liked, what is disliked, and why, may be time consuming, but it may significantly improve the
selection process.
Finally, feedback from librarians who work directly with children using children’s
software should be sought as a way of improving the selection process.
Prepared February 16, 2007; revised March 5, 2007