ALA   American Library Association Search ALA      Contact ALA      Login     

CHOICE - Current Reviews for Academic Libraries 45th anniversary
Site Map Contact Us About Choice Magazine About ALA Home
 

Choice Reviews Online
Reviews since 1988



 Home
 Choice Reviews Online
 Previous Issues
 How to Subscribe
 Outstanding Academic Titles
 Info for Publishers
 Info for Reviewers
 Info for Advertisers
 Submit a Cover
 Selection Policy
 Sample Content
 Bibliographic Essays
                       

Opens new window to print this page


Selection Policy

Criteria for Selection

Principal Criteria

Readership Level: The subject matter is presented primarily at a level appropriate for undergraduate use, whether in a community college, a four-year college, or university.

Content: The content of the work complements the undergraduate curriculum and is suitable for inclusion in an academic library collection.

Quality: The authors or producers display command of the subject matter, and the material is presented in a comprehensive, well-organized, and understandable manner. The work contains appropriate supporting apparatus, such as an index, illustrations, bibliography, notes, and appendixes.

General Publication Criteria

Language: Only English-language publications are reviewed, with some exceptions, such as foreign-language dictionaries. Bilingual publications are occasionally given review consideration.

Place of Publication or Production, and Price: Works may be published in any country, but a price in U.S. currency must be available.

Publisher: Titles are rarely selected for review only on the basis of publisher. University presses often  receive special  consideration because Choice assumes that readers are particularly  interested in their  output and  because they represent  a high level of scholarship.  Small press and alternative publishers' books are selected whenever possible since they may  never be reviewed elsewhere. Vanity publishing is not reviewed.

Publication  or Release Date:  Publication date must  be current, as Choice  emphasizes currency of material  and strives to send material for review within three months  of publication. Publications older than six months  receive special scrutiny for their importance and uniqueness.

Review Copy: Choice reviews only the finished version of  a work, not a prepublication form such as page proofs, or beta test versions for electronic products.

Material Type Criteria

Collections: Collections,  anthologies, or  “readers” of materials previously published in readily accessible sources are generally not reviewed. However, they may be reviewed if they  are in  some way original or unique,  e.g., the collection principle is unusual or creative or the editorial apparatus casts significant new light on the contents.

Government  Publications: These are  reviewed on  the same basis as other publications.

Instructional Manuals and How-to Items: These publications are reviewed very  selectively. They are given  greatest consideration in subject areas where they may have important value for  self-study and reference, for  example, in the science  and technology, business, and sports and physical education sections. How-to books  will be  given review consideration if they are appropriate for community college curricula.

Materials for Children: Except for reference tools or  works supporting  children's literature and  elementary education curricula, these works are usually not reviewed.

Microforms: Fiche and film will be treated as print items in most cases.

Multivolume Sets:   Small sets (two to  four volumes)  are reviewed  together when possible. For longer sets or those published over  time, Choice usually will review  only the first  two  volumes and the last volume of the set; interim volumes may be  reviewed if there has been a long passage of time between publication of individual volumes, or if there has been a major change in  the scope of the set.

Popularizations: Popular works are reviewed  selectively  if content is relevant to the undergraduate audience  and the work  is judged to be authoritatively presented or  written and sufficiently documented to assist readers in  more in­depth study. Popularizations in science and technology are more frequently reviewed.

Reprints: Previously  published  material is  usually  not reviewed. A  reissue  of a  significant  book originally published in a very small edition, or abroad, or by a very obscure publisher, will be considered  for review. In  addition,  material reprinted  from  several sources into  a  collection may be reviewed  if  the work provides  convenient,  one-volume access to  scattered or difficult-to-obtain material.

Revisions: Revisions are reviewed selectively. They are given  greatest consideration for review if there are  major changes or an extended period of time has elapsed  between the new  and the old edition of a standard work, or if  an earlier edition of a significant work was not reviewed.

Serials and Continuations: Choice will usually review  only the first volume of a new serial publication, for  example, annual compilations, yearbooks, or “advances in” publications.  Monographic volumes issued as a  part of a series will be assessed and reviewed individually unless a group review is either feasible or of more value to Choice readers.

Symposia and Festschriften: Not usually reviewed unless well integrated and  focused  on a topic  of interest  to undergraduates, or covering an important new topic not well covered in other monographs or texts.

TextbooksChoice reviews textbooks very selectively, e.g., when a text represents a basic treatise or synthesis of the subject, particularly of a new or complex subject.

Criteria Specific to Electronic Resources

Choice's general  selection  criteria, especially for content, quality, and audience level,  also apply to electronic  resources, which  encompass CD-ROMs, online databases,  computer software, Internet  sites, and original e-book  publications (books only  available in electronic format).  Additional  criteria specific to electronic resources include the following:

Value to Academic Library Collections: Choice editors  give priority to  reviewing resources that are comprehensive or broad in coverage  and that are  relevant to academic libraries serving the  reference and research  needs of undergraduate students.

Comparative Formats: Choice reviews resources available only in electronic  format as well as electronic resources  that have print counterparts. In selecting electronic resources with print counterparts, however, priority will be given  to reviewing  those that offer unique content or features  over their print versions.

Currency and Updates: Product information should show evidence that, when  necessary and appropriate, the publisher/producer plans to update regularly.

Hardware and Software: Technical requirements of a  product should be  compatible with standard and commonly available hardware/software in libraries.

Publication or Release Date: Choice strives for currency but is more flexible with  respect to publication date when assigning electronic resources for review  because identifying and procuring these resources often takes longer and is  more complicated. In addition, many new  products undergo early revision to correct technical flaws, and this may delay review.

Stability of Content:  There should be evidence that  an electronic product or Internet site is stable in content and format so  that it can be properly  evaluated. No beta versions  (products still in development) will be  accepted for review; only finished materials ready for sale will be considered.

[Contents] [Next Section]






CHOICE is a publication of the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL),
a division of American Library Association.
For questions or comments, contact the Website editor.
Copyright © 2006 by American Library Association.
ISSN 0009-4978
Site designed and developed by Fyrsta.com