Drafts of several telecommunications bills aimed at enabling phone carriers to get into the video business are currently making their way through the House and Senate, Reuters reported May 2. None of them specifically address “net neutrality,” or the idea that telephone or cable companies should provide services to all customers at the same cost, the system basically in effect now. Telecom companies have argued that they deserve the right to charge premium rates for faster, unrestricted service to make their investment in new technologies viable, the Cnet online news service reported May 2.
“Those who cannot afford the premium rates—nonprofits, the public sector, libraries, schools, and colleges—would be relegated to the equivalent of third-class mail,” American Library Association Washington Office Executive Director Emily Sheketoff told American Libraries. “This legislation has an impact not only on libraries and their ability to deliver first-class service to patrons, but to the general public as well.”
In introducing the bill, Markey said that broadband neutrality was threatened when the Federal Communications Commission removed a requirement for nondiscriminatory treatment by telecom companies in August 2005. He had earlier introduced a net neutrality amendment to the bill under consideration by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, but it failed April 26 by a 34–22 vote.
Posted May 5, 2006.