
The participants, representing various ALA divisions and committees, began by brainstorming to determine priority areas on which to concentrate over the coming year. After identifying four priority areas—criteria for filters/compliance/implementation, communication/public relations, political/legislative, and research/data collection—they then broke into small groups to discuss approaches to address each area.
Among the trickier considerations was ALA’s role in regard to the manufacturers of Internet filters. Since ALA policy is to oppose the use of filters in libraries, Executive Director Keith Michael Fiels said the Association’s message must include “a way to acknowledge our constant opposition to filters.” Fiels stated that its antifilter stand shouldn’t preclude ALA developing criteria for filters and then evaluating software based on those standards, noting that “we don’t support floods, but we help libraries that are flooded.”
After the meeting, Hayden issued a list of next steps, which included:
Posted September 1, 2003.