|
Using the ToolkitThis toolkit is designed to support advocacy efforts that work toward changing the scholarly communication system, and to provide information on scholarly communication issues for librarians, faculty, academic administrators, and other campus stakeholders. The toolkit aims to address these concerns in ways that meet the needs of the full range of academic institutions that make up the ACRL membership base. A primary goal of the toolkit is to summarize key issues and content to give readers quick, basic information on scholarly communication topics. A second goal is to provide tools that will allow individuals to deepen their knowledge in particular areas, and to develop materials for use with their consitutiencies. The bibliography and webliography sections identify a few key items from among the wealth of information available. Powerpoint presentations, graphics, and other materials can be adapted for local use. This tools page is organized by first by type of tool, and within type by subject. The tools page begins with a modest number of offerings and will grow as librarians and other campus professionals submit materials for consideration. Creators will retain copyright to all materials accepted. Materials will be accepted by this site if the creator agrees to allow others to copy, distribute, or modify materials for local use, for educational purposes, with attribution. See the Creative Commons Publish tool for more information about choosing a license. We suggest the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike-2.0 license. Submit materials for consideration, and suggestions for additional readings or web sites to the site administrator. Web SitesAuthor Control of Copyright Copyright Resources for Authors is an excellent SPARC offering. This site includes information on their Author's Addendum which preserves rights for broader use of your works; and language you can use to modify publisher agreements if your research was funded by the National Institutes of Health and you wish to follow their public access policy. The SHERPA web site summarizes permissions (by publisher) that are normally given as part of a publisher's copyright transfer agreement. These are publishers that typically want authors to transfer copyright, but the publisher automatically allows some rights to remain with the author. These are the default policies and changes or exceptions can often be negotiated by authors. You and Your Copyrights: Securing, Managing, and Sharing the Legal Rights, Copyright Management Center, Indiana University, Purdue University at Indianapolis. This site provides more basic information on copyright, including a discussion of works-made-for-hire, those works that were created by an employee in the scope of his or her employment, and therefore belong to the employer. Copyright Management for Scholarship: Key Issues & Good Practices: Agreements is a checklist of points to consider when entering into publishing agreements, created by the Zwolle Group, an international working group on copyright in academe. Johns Hopkins provides a tool that offers Hopkins authors data on journals and publishers. Their goal is to help authors find publishers that support the free exchange of information through author-friendly policies, and are cost competitive. CopyOwn is maintained by the University of Maryland. Many higher education institutions have intellectual proporty policies that allow faculty to own the copyright in works they produce during the course of employment. Some institutions opt to retain some rights under the work-for-hire law. This Web site and the underlying research is devoted to understanding the emerging conflicts over copyright ownership within the higher education community and seek to find appropriate solutions that everyone can live with. It includes links to policies for many AAU/ARL institutions. Authors should understand whether whether or not they own all rights to their works before negotiating with publishers. Journal Pricing Historical Price Data by Library Type Sticker Shock Open Access Access to the Literature: The Debate Continues Open Access News Publisher Mergers and Acquisitions Information Access Alliance The Academic Publishing Industry: A Story of Merger and Acquisition Taking Action Peter Suber has compiled and summarized a list of college and university actions against high journal prices. The list includes many links to policy statements. Suber's site also contains a list of actions to further the cause of open access. Create Change, developed by the Association of Research Libraries and SPARC and supported by the Association of College and Research Libraries, asks "Shouldn't the way we share research be as advanced as the Internet?" It includes actions you can take.BioMed Central has compiled a list of foundations willing to allow the use of grant funds for processing fees charged by open access journals. ReadingsScholarly Communication in General Suzanne E. Thorin, "Global Changes in Scholarly Communication" Presented at e-Workshops on Scholarly Communication in the Digital Era, August 11-24, 2003 at Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan. 23 pp. Jean-Claude Guedon, "In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing" Washington, DC: The Association of Research Libraries, (2002): 70pp. Alternatives in Scholarly Publishing Richard C. Atkinson, "A New World of Scholarly Communication" Chronicle of Higher Education 50, no11, (Nov. 7, 2003): B16 Author Control of Copyright Mark S. Frankel, Seizing the Moment: Scientists' Authorship Rights in the Digital Age, American Association for the Advancement of Science, (2002): 32pp. Bundling / Aggregating / Big Deal Subscriptions Carl T. Berstrom and Theodore C. Bergstrom, "The Economics of Scholarly Journal Publishing" 2002; updated May 2006. See also the table "Journal Pricing Across Disciplines". Mary M. Case, "Trends and Issues" in Implications of Aggregate Subscriptions to Electronic Journals, EBSCO Information Services, Vantage Point Series, no.55 (Jan/Feb/March 2001):3-5. Mary M. Case "A Snapshot in Time: ARL Libraries and Electronic Journal Resources" ARL no.235 (August 2004):1-10. Aaron S. Edlin & Daniel Rubenfeld, "Exclusion or Efficient Pricing? The 'Big Deal' Bundling of Academic Journals" ABA: Antitrust Law Journal 72, no.1 (2004):119-157. Kenneth Frazier, "The Librarians' Dilemma: Contemplating the Costs of the 'Big Deal'" D-Lib Magazine 7, no.1 (March 2001). Institutional Repositories Lynch, Clifford A. "Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age" ARL, no.226 (February 2003):1-7. Mark Ware, "Institutional Repositories and Scholarly Publishing" Learned Publishing 17 (2004):115-124. Open Access Kristin Antelman, "Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?" College and Research Libraries 65, no.5 (September 2004):372-382. Peter Suber, "Removing Barriers to Research: An Introduction to Open Access for Librarians" C&RL News 62, no.2, (February 2003):92-94,113. Publisher Mergers and Acquisitions Mary M. Case, "Information Access Alliance: Challenging Anticompetitive Behavior in Academic Publishing" C&RL News 65, no.6 (June 2004):310-313, 326. Elisa Eiseman, Kei Koizumi, and Donna Fossum, "Federal Investment in R&D", Rand Science and Technology Policy Institute, Project Memorandum PM-1336-OSTP, Arlington, VA, (July 2002):15. Albert A. Foer. President, "Can Antitrust Save Academic Publishing?" Paper presented at the American Library Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, June 28, 2004; revised July 20, 2004. 25pp. Mark J. McCabe, "The Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices: An Update", ARL, no. 207, (December 1999). Mark J. McCabe, "Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach," The American Economic Review 92, no.1, (March 2002):265-67. Mark J. McCabe Law Serials Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, 3, no.1, article 11, (2004): 29pp. Michael A. Stoller, Robert Christopherson, and Michael Miranda, "The Economics of Professional Journal Pricing," College & Research Libraries, 57(January 1996):7-21. Thomas M. Susman & David J. Carter. "Publisher Mergers: A Consumer-Based Approach to Antitrust Analysis" Washington, D.C., Information Access Alliance, (2003) 33pp. Carol Tenopir and Donald W. King, "Toward Electronic Serials", Special Libraries Association, Washington, D.C. 2000, p. 159-75; and Education for Change Ltd., SIRU, University of Brighton, and The Research Partnership, "Researchers Use of Libraries and other Information Sources: Current Patterns and Future Trends," Higher Education Funding Council for English, 2003, p. 20-21. PowerPoint PresentationsScholarly Communication General The State of Scholarly Communications: An Environmental Scan of Emerging Issues, Pitfalls, and Possibilities. Lee Van Orsdel Trends in Scholarly Communication. Richard Fyffe Advocacy Scholarly Communication: Legislative and Political Advocacy. James G. Neal Change Strategies Scholarly Communication: Strategies for Change. James G. Neal Copyright Copyright, Licensing, and Information Policy: Mine, Mine, and Well, Mine! Dwayne Buttler Copyright or Copyleft: Who Owns Our Thoughts? Karen Williams Copyright, Intellectual Property and Scholarly Communication. Karen Williams Journal Pricing Anatomy of a Crisis: Dysfunction in the Scholarly Communications System. Lee Van Orsdel Open Access. Karen Williams Publisher Mergers & Acquisitions / Competitive Market Fostering a Competitive Market. Ray English Brochures and HandoutsScholarly Communication in General Create Change Open Access The Open Access brochure, also from SPARC, ARL and ACRL, presents a specific approach to change, by describing the benefits of open access to authors, readers, teachers, scholars, and scientists. Facts and figures demonstrate how open access to scholarly research capitalizes on Internet connectivity to increase a research article's use and impact. The brochure suggests steps authors of journal articles can take to provide open access to their work. |
| ACRL is a division of the American Library Association |
| ©2003 American Library Association.Copyright Statement Last Revised: January 4, 2006 |