
|
"We do not help children when we simply wall them off from information and ideas that are controversial or disturbing. If they are to succeed in the Information Age, they must learn to be discerning users of information." |
|
Early in our careers as librarians in the United States, we learn about censorship, the First Amendment, and the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom’s 100 most challenged books. We know that books are usually challenged with best intentions - to protect others, frequently children, from controversial ideas and information. We go on with our professional lives. We attend conference sessions and workshops on intellectual freedom. We write our selection policies and put them in the drawer, yet we rarely have to use those policies to defend our decision to purchase a book. Occasionally some of us get a more in-depth look at censorship when someone challenges a book in our library and we must defend our students’ rights to access information – rights that may trouble some others. We rely on the U.S. Constitution to support our stance. The First Amendment is a powerful document … but it only works in the United States. What happens, though, if you are a school librarian outside the United States? Whose laws do you follow? Is intellectual freedom an important part of the foundation of libraries in international schools? Are there policies regarding selection and retention of educational materials in international schools? A colleague from the United Kingdom asked in a message on the European Council of International School {ECIS} librarians list , “Do American values regarding freedom-to-read hold in non-American countries? Should they?” The Anglo American School of Moscow is where I spend the majority of my time these days. Every day I walk to my fourth floor library, up 87 steps, past the Hall of Flags. From A to Z, these gloriously colored flags represent the cultural diversity of our student body and the 67 countries that our 1250 students call home. They come to our two libraries, elementary and middle/high, in groups and individually, to read, to work collaboratively, to hang out, and to use the computers—for work and for play. The Anglo American School is one of 194 schools worldwide that is “American-sponsored” which means we “receive assistance and support from the U.S. Government under a program administered by the Office of Overseas Schools of the U.S. Department of State ( We are also sponsored by the Canadian and British embassies.) While American sponsored schools incorporate U.S. educational programs, their international context means that their philosophies, programs and procedures are quite diverse. Do our students and their parents think about the diversity of our collection? Do they know that there is something in our libraries, or available on our library computers, that may offend everyone? The Anglo-American School, like some other American-sponsored international schools has a Board-approved selection and reconsideration policy on their Web site that mirrors anything I would expect to find in the United States. Excluding U.S. Department of Defense Schools (DODDS), international schools number in the hundreds across the globe—an accurate count depends on your interpretation of the term international school. “Not counting storefronts on the backstreets of Calcutta, Shanghai, Bangkok or such, still, there are a lot of reputable and semi-reputable international schools enrolling host country nationals with a largely foreign teaching staff. So, while the question is impossible to answer, the minimum number is in the 500 to 600 range, more likely 700 or so. The growth of schools in China alone over the past few years (not to mention Dubai) has been phenomenal.” (Name withheld, personal communication, April 2, 2007) “Just as it is difficult to count the number of schools, it is difficult to make any sweeping generalizations about international schools, including American-sponsored ones. They vary widely in size, funding, curriculum, and demographics of student populations, governance and “ownership”. You can categorize schools by nationality or curriculum (British, American, Swedish, German, and French). Even proprietary schools can be very different - Is one run by a multinational company (Armco, mining companies) different from real estate developers or private individuals?” (Name withheld, personal communication, April 2, 2007) The European Council of International Schools maintains a listserv for librarians to share ideas and issues. Librarians on the list include primarily those who work in European schools. The list of participants also includes colleagues from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. They are savvy librarians who quickly answered my questions about intellectual freedom issues. I learned that, for some, decisions about what is bought and used is determined by the laws of the countries they live in. For others, decisions are bound by the governing bodies of the school or based on cultural norms of the host country. Generally the owners of the school, embassies, governments, administrators and/or IT directors all have a hand in decision-making in international schools. With the exception of librarians in the Middle East, my colleagues’ responses are remarkably similar to the range of answers you get in the United States. Some librarians asked not to be named thus, although some are quoted, no one is named. Here is a sampling that represents a cross section of their responses: Do you have school Intellectual Freedom policies?
What to do with the swimsuit issue of Sports Illustrated? (Sports Illustrated became a big issue recently when the company announced that the swimsuit issue would not be sent to public and school libraries.)
Does your school filter? Are the social networking sites, MySpace and YouTube, blocked at your school?
While cutting out pages of books or modifying them to meet the standards of the host country “censor” is not part of the skill set any librarian learns in Library 101, but denying access to certain materials through the use of filters and firewalls occurs in schools all over the world and the United States is no exception. International librarians reported occasional concerns by parents or by administrators but no formal challenges. We live in a complex world, one united electronically by access to global information that flows from computer to server to computer. There are no easy answers to the troubling intellectual freedom issues that global Internet access brings, but we need to take to heart a vision of where we’d like to be, even as we deal with the realities of what we currently have. In 1999 the Freedom Forum asked me for a quote for their annual calendar. I chose a sentence from a speech about the rights that young people have to access information. "We do not help children when we simply wall them off from information and ideas that are controversial or disturbing. If they are to succeed in the Information Age, they must learn to be discerning users of information." These words hold true, whether you work in a school library or a public library in the United States, in a Department of Defense school, or in an international school anywhere in the world. Each of us make decisions daily about what we select, how we deal with intellectual freedom, and how far we are willing to go to defend the values at the foundation of librarianship. In his classic article, “Not Censorship but Selection”, Lester Asheim ends with a powerful statement, “ If we are to gain the esteem we seek for our profession, we must be willing to accept the difficult obligations which those ideals imply.” (Asheim 1953) Out here in the international school community, beyond the protection of the First Amendment, assuring intellectual freedom can be a more difficult challenge and, sometimes, a lonely task. Works Cited Asheim, Lester. "Not Censorship But Selection”, Wilson Library Bulletin, 28 (September 1953), 63-67 . Accessed 3 April 2007. Further Reading/References American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom. Intellectual Freedom Manual. 7th Ed. Chicago: American Library Association, 2006. American Library Association Office for Intellectual Freedom Home Page.< http://www.ala.org/oif.html > Censorship: Opposing Viewpoints (San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005) The First Amendment Center Free Expression Clearinghouse: A Guide to Free Speech and the First Amendment. The Freedom Forum Intellectual Freedom Manual, Indiana Library Federation Bibliography Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. Chicago: Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association. Available by subscription and online at: Regional Education Associations, Office of Overseas Schools, U.S. Department of State Symons, Ann K. and Charles Harmon. Protecting the Right to Read: A How-To-Do-It Manual for School and Public Librarians (New York, Neal-Schuman, 1995) Symons, Ann K. and Reed, Sally Gardner. Speaking Out! Voices in Celebration of Intellectual Freedom (Chicago, American Library Association, 1999). |
|
|
-----------------
![]() |
Ann K. Symons is the middle school/high school librarian at The Anglo-American School of Moscow. She is the co-author, with Charles Harmon, of Protecting the Right to Read: A How-To-Do-It Manual for School and Public Librarians and editor, with Sally Gardner Reed, of Voices in Celebration of Intellectual Freedom . Symons is a past treasurer and president of the American Library Association and recipient of several intellectual freedom awards including the AASL Intellectual Freedom Award, the Robert B. Downs Intellectual Freedom Award, and F reedom to Read Foundation Roll of Honor Award given to the Juneau School District for its defense of Daddy’s Roommate. |